SEBI approves informant mechanism and reward policy
June 1, 2019
In a Discussion Paper dated 10 June 2019, Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has proposed an Informant Mechanism and a need for an Informant Reward policy be incorporated in the SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading Regulations) 2015 (PIT Regulations) to overcome several challenges in dealing with violations of insider trading. Some of these are, proof of the flow of information, absence of details of generation of information, identification of connection between insiders and those who traded unpublished price sensitive information (UPSI) and establishing that trading took place while in possession of UPSI. A formal mechanism that specifies a reporting procedure and provides incentives and protection for the informants will, in SEBI’s view, instil confidence in the market and encourage informants to report such issues without any fear of victimisation or loss of employment.
The key features of the Informant Mechanism are as follows:
- An “informant” means any individual who voluntarily submits a Voluntary Information Disclosure Form (VIDF) providing credible, complete and original information relating to an act of insider trading that has occurred, is occurring or is reasonably believed to occur.
- It is mandatory to provide the source of the original information along with an undertaking that such information has not been obtained from a SEBI employee or any related regulator.
- An independent office called the Office of Informant Protection (OIP) may be established which will set up the process of receiving, verifying, authenticating and analysing the VIDF. The OIP will also decide on the grant of reward to the informant post completion of enforcement action and recovery of disgorged amounts.
- The identity of the informant is required to be disclosed on the submission of the VIDF. In case the informant wishes to submit anonymously, VIDF may be filed through a legal representative. Personal appearance before the OIP may be required for ascertaining identity and verification of information in the VIDF. OIP is obligated to maintain confidentiality regarding the identity of the informant unless his evidence is required during SEBI proceedings. The legal representative will obtain a non-waivable consent to disclose the identity of the informant if required in connection with any court proceeding or when required by SEBI.
- The OIP will process the information given by the informant and may transfer it to the dealing departments for further action, after redacting information that may reveal the identity of the informant. The OIP will submit a report to SEBI on an annual basis, which will also be released to the public. It will also maintain a hotline to provide guidance to persons to file information.
- The reward granted will be a monetary amount from the monies disgorged as a result of action taken, provided the amount disgorged is at least Rs. 5 crores. The amount of reward shall be 10% of the amount collected but shall not exceed Rs. 1 crore or such higher amount as may be specified. An interim reward not exceeding Rs. 10 lakhs may be given at the stage of issue of the final order by SEBI against the person directed to disgorge. The final reward will be issued after recovery of the disgorged amount which should equal at least twice the final reward. The reward shall be paid out of the Investor Protection and Education Fund (IPEF).
- Original information may be shared with any other appropriate regulatory and law enforcement authority within or outside India, subject to SEBI’s discretion. The confidentiality of the identity of the informant will however be maintained, unless circumstances require otherwise.
- Information provided will be exempted from disclosure u/s 8(1)(g) and 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act.
- Listed companies and intermediaries dealing with UPSI shall incorporate in their Code of Conduct suitable provisions to ensure that no employee who files a VIDF or assists the OIP is discharged, terminated, demoted, suspended, threatened or discriminated, directly or indirectly, for breach of the company’s confidentiality agreement. In case of violation of the Code of Conduct, penalties, prosecution proceedings, debarment etc may be levied/initiated by SEBI.
- If an action/proceeding is initiated against an Informant, SEBI will consider the co-operation extended by him and declare him eligible for a reward after he has paid monetary penalties levied against him or complied with directions. An informant who is culpable, but voluntarily co-operates, may be eligible for a reward or settlement, with confidentiality in the proceedings.
The proposed amendments will be made effective from the 100th day of their notification so as to enable market participants to become conversant with the requirements and enable them to create necessary systems for implementation.
Subsequently, in its Board Meeting held on 21 August 2019, SEBI approved the abovementioned amendments to the PIT Regulations.
SAM & Co comment
SEBI in its board meeting held in August 2019 has approved the amendments to the PIT Regulations dealing with the introduction of the informant mechanism. It needs to be seen how approachable this mechanism will turn out to be. One must bear in mind the possible compromise with respect to confidentiality of the identity of the informant, which may be considered by SEBI at the time of leading evidence during the relevant proceedings. SEBI seems to have overlooked the hardship that an informant may practically face in being able to provide evidence to it. It is possible that subjectivity may be involved in determination of the veracity of complaints due to the lack of any basis/ guidance in such regard. As a result, the whole mechanism may lead to wrongful classification of genuine complaints as frivolous (because of unavailability of sufficient evidence), for which SEBI may initiate action against such informants. This may prove to be counterproductive to the objective of the proposed mechanism. Having said that, SEBI has taken a step in the right direction, but has only laid down broad guidelines for the same. The devil will be in the details which have been skipped.