The High Court of Delhi recently modified an interim injunction upon being apprised of concealment of material facts. The Single Judge directed that the interim injunction in favour of Mittal Electronics (“ME”) and against Sujata Home Appliances (“SHA”) be modified on a positive finding of active concealment of the fact that ME did not manufacture any of the goods in question and that an interim injunction against SHA qua those goods is unjustified and unreasonable.
The Bar Council of India does not permit solicitation of work and advertising by legal practitioners and advocates. By accessing the Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co. website (our website), the user acknowledges that:
Click here for important public notice from the Firm.